On a weird side note: in World of Tanks we now have a Matilda tank with an open-top turret fited with a high velocity AT 75mm gun... it's weird.
edit; and with just a 3-man crew...
Picture available?
On a weird side note: in World of Tanks we now have a Matilda tank with an open-top turret fited with a high velocity AT 75mm gun... it's weird.
edit; and with just a 3-man crew...
Indeed! Not a terrible idea, just rather too low for an efficient design. I rather liked the first version with the boxier casement, a very reasonable design.I think this one would need the "hamster" crew as we like to say around here when these things happen.
What about tweaking the WW2 Lorraine 37L? It was mostly used as a supplies carrier, I believe, but.....The Achzarit is an Israeli conversion of the T54/55, with a new engine squeezed over to the left to allow an access "tunnel" for troops at the rear of the vehicle. It makes me wonder what other modern MBTs, or even WW2 tanks could have similar modifications, to turn them into APCs.
Or perhaps have their engines moved to the front, in a similar manner to the Merkava/Nammer. After all, the Israelis did this with the Sherman.
View attachment 702657
The Germans converted them into SPG's and TD's.What about tweaking the WW2 Lorraine 37L? It was mostly used as a supplies carrier, I believe, but.....
(from tanksencyclopedia.com)
I believe this machine was a tweaked 39L version. The earlier models had a lower deck.
Is that an ambulance, with the red insignia?The Achzarit is an Israeli conversion of the T54/55, with a new engine squeezed over to the left to allow an access "tunnel" for troops at the rear of the vehicle. It makes me wonder what other modern MBTs, or even WW2 tanks could have similar modifications, to turn them into APCs.
Or perhaps have their engines moved to the front, in a similar manner to the Merkava/Nammer. After all, the Israelis did this with the Sherman.
View attachment 702657
We've done a lot of these types of conversions with different types of AFV's. I've converted Pz.II's, IV's, M3 Grants and other tanks into APC's and IFV's.The Achzarit is an Israeli conversion of the T54/55, with a new engine squeezed over to the left to allow an access "tunnel" for troops at the rear of the vehicle. It makes me wonder what other modern MBTs, or even WW2 tanks could have similar modifications, to turn them into APCs.
Or perhaps have their engines moved to the front, in a similar manner to the Merkava/Nammer. After all, the Israelis did this with the Sherman.
View attachment 702657
The Achzarit is an Israeli conversion of the T54/55, with a new engine squeezed over to the left to allow an access "tunnel" for troops at the rear of the vehicle. It makes me wonder what other modern MBTs, or even WW2 tanks could have similar modifications, to turn them into APCs.
Or perhaps have their engines moved to the front, in a similar manner to the Merkava/Nammer. After all, the Israelis did this with the Sherman.
View attachment 702657
Italian tanks in WWII had not made a positive impression
Valentine Mk XI had a ring diameter of 1466mm (75mmL40)Wolverine
An alternate Valentine tank I made for the "Munich Shuffle: 1938-1942" TL by @Garrison
The premise of the TL is that Chamberlain realizes that war inevitable and gets Britain and the some of the other Dominions to start rearming earlier than OTL.
Canada decides to produce their own tanks and choose the Valentine as their main tank and also build a version with a short barreled 75mm gun for infantry support.
I used the M2/M3 howitzer, same gun was used on the M8 a variant of the M3 Stuart.
Here's a link to the TL if anyone is interested - https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/munich-shuffle-1938-1942.518000/
It's well written TL and I recommend it.
Interesting. I used a Mk.III Valentine, the pic I used didn't have a coax mg in the turret but I agree with you that it looks like there was plenty of room for one.Valentine Mk XI had a ring diameter of 1466mm (75mmL40)
M8 GMC 1382mm ring (75mmL18) note: M3 Stuart has a 1188mm ring, it was enlarged for the M8
Now this Valentine has a slightly larger ring, with a smaller cannon. The M8 had the Assistant Diver also act as Loader, Valentine could have a proper 3 man turret as the 2pdr version had
while keeping the coax BESA
On a weird side note: in World of Tanks we now have a Matilda tank with an open-top turret fited with a high velocity AT 75mm gun... it's weird.
edit; and with just a 3-man crew...
Progretto 66*
In the early 1960's there was voiced by many member of the Italian government and military for a home designed and built modern tank, Italian tanks in WWII had not made a positive impression and there were many who now wanted Italy to have a tank they could be proud of, there were several domestic tank designs developed in Italy for both medium and heavy tanks but none were seriously considered until a strong faction of both military an political figures joined forces to insist that Italy arm her army with a tank of it's own.
The government responded by putting out requests to various Italian companies to submit designs for a new tank, when the US learned of this they offered to sell the Italians surplus M48's and the West German government also offered to sell Italy license to built the Leopard1 but many voiced their opposition to buying or building a foreign design.
Several domestic designs were submitted by Italian companies some were for heavy tanks and some were mediums but the Army decided they wanted a Main Battle Tank a new term being used by many members of NATO. With a designated type of tank finalized the Army decided that none of the designs submitted were suitable, the Army then officially requested that the new tank be equipped with the Royal Ordnance L7 105mm gun which was the gun of choice for most members of NATO and that the tank also use a diesel engine.
The Italian government responded by acquiring license to build or buy the L7 gun and the Continental AV1790 diesel engine from the US. The Company of Conservio Iveco Oto Melaro (CIO) summitted a design for a medium weight tank that used the same suspension from the US M48 tank (the US disappointed by failure to sell M48's, accepted the deal to license out the M48's suspension), the US also sold the license to Italy to make the AV1790.
The hull of the new tank somewhat resembled West Germany's Leo-1 except for the engine deck and a sharper sloped armoured front hull. the turret was a mushroomed shaped hull similar to Soviet T-55 & T-62 series of tank but with a gun mantle similar to that of the M48.
The new tank was accepted by the Italian government in 1966 and was dubbed the Progretto 66, the new tank due to teething troubles would not fully enter service until 1968
and would serve the Italian military until the mid 1980's when it was replaced by the Ariete C1 also built by Conservio Iveco Oto Melaro .
View attachment 703242
A request by ThirdyLovesAH for a Cold War era MBT.
* The name of the Progretto 66 and engine are the only things my design has in common with the "World of Tanks" Progretto 66 .
I did look at that tank for inspiration but couldn't find any but while looking up cold war era tanks on Wikipedia for ideas I came across a bit about the Italians mounting a diesel engine and a 105 cannon in an M48 and things clicked from there on.
The design started out as an M47 with a Leo-1 turret and then slowly evolved.
EDIT: originally started with an M47, not the 48.
Interesting.It's more pure fiction from Wargaming. Postwar in Australia, a lot of the turrets had been scrapped, as hulls were kept around for utility/farm tasks. So when the time came that people wanted to display the tanks, any turrets available would be used to make the vehicles look like "tanks".
The actual Progetto 66 (if you can even call it that) was nothing more than an outline by an Italian military officer about a potential future tank. Sadly the original magazine article from the 1960s is long gone. Still cool though!
Please feel free.Interesting. I used a Mk.III Valentine, the pic I used didn't have a coax mg in the turret but I agree with you that it looks like there was plenty of room for one.
I might be able to an an MG from a pic of a Mk.XI I have.
And I can totally see that if the Japanese decide they need this in a hurry they just expect the crew to contort themselves into the vehicle regardless.Comparing the side and front view it looks as if the hull is significantly shorther than the suspension/threads, which would improve gun depression but make the thing even more cramped.
On the other hand the super tiny Hetzer also managed to somehow fit a crew of 4 (even if rather badly).