Programming Note:

I feel as if I'm properly hitting the broad strokes of the TL's first four decades pretty well here, but I'll be breaking each Prologue update into smaller chunks (probably 4-5 years apiece) until we get caught up to May 1915, since the 1900-15 period is so much more plot dense.
 
Programming Note:

I feel as if I'm properly hitting the broad strokes of the TL's first four decades pretty well here, but I'll be breaking each Prologue update into smaller chunks (probably 4-5 years apiece) until we get caught up to May 1915, since the 1900-15 period is so much more plot dense.
Cool. Really enjoying them either way!
 
culminated in the technologically advanced Chilean Navy forcing a standoff with the United States Navy over a brief peacekeeping intervention in Panama, which erupted into the brief and bizarre Chilean-American War of 1885
Oh god, I forgot about this. We really are the Serbia of this TL, aren't we?
We really need a Liberal stan to counterbalance Curtain Jerker, lol.
The assassination of Prince Alfred in Sydney in 1868 by an Irish nationalist
Which reminds me, what's been going on down under in this TL? I've completely forgotten anything that's happened there since this murder.
 
Oh god, I forgot about this. We really are the Serbia of this TL, aren't we?

We really need a Liberal stan to counterbalance Curtain Jerker, lol.

Which reminds me, what's been going on down under in this TL? I've completely forgotten anything that's happened there since this murder.
Lol that’s pretty good.

idk about that, there’s really not that much about them to actively stan (it’s a party that ranges from decent enough to whatevs all the way to aggressively mediocre and some malignantly bad), I just think they’re not *that* terrible. Both Ds and Ls are a step above their OTL analogues as of 1915, that’s for sure

Honestly not that much, why they’ve gotten short shrift so far. NZ is part of the Commonwealth. There’ll be more attention paid there soon though once Billy Hughes becomes PM…
 
Prologue - New Century, New Problems
Prologue - New Century, New Problems

The 20th century dawned with a sense of trepidation for many, fearful of the massive cultural, technological and economic changes rolling across the world; the phenomenon of this fairly widespread sentiment of queasy dread mixed with cautious optimism that denoted the transition from one century to another came to be known later as the fin de siecle, and there was perhaps reason for people to be worried about what was to come with the dawn of a new century.

No sooner had the 1900s begun than they were marked with extraordinary bloodshed; in China, the Boxer Rebellion against Western influences, in particular the conversion of Chinese to Christianity, had gained such steam that entire provinces across the North of China were utterly lawless, and rather than attempt to put down the revolt, the Qing government controlled by the Dowager Empress Cixi instead not only indulged the Boxers but began encouraging their violent outbursts against Westerners, finally endorsing their cause in the late spring. This ended with the Siege of the Peking Legations, in which thousands of Boxers attacked defenseless foreigners in the quarter of Peking where they resided and, after the makeshift defenses failed, massacred them nearly to a man. When a British expedition to free them failed and was brutally slaughtered in the field, seven European countries - Britain, France, Russia, Germany, Austria, Italy and Spain - along with Japan and the United States formed the Nine Nation Alliance to forcibly retaliate. This Boxer Intervention was a difficult proposition; seizing the port city of Tientsin was exceedingly difficult and the first instances of trench warfare were observed in the Zhihli Province of China over the next year as the Alliance attempted to press towards Peking but were frequently pushed back both by Boxers as well as the professional forces of the Chinese state. In a particularly infamous episode, British General Lord Charles Gordon was surrounded with his men in Tientsin and they were all killed; not until the next spring would the Alliance finally press their way in a bloody campaign in which entire Chinese villages were put to the sword to Peking, which fell in June of 1901 with tens of thousands of casualties, many civilian - including the Guangxu Emperor, under suspicious circumstances, and became an infamous episode of imperialist wanton murder, rape and looting known now as the Sack of Peking.

The Boxer War was a rallying moment across Europe, providing an hour of unprecedented cooperation overseas amongst the imperial powers, and particularly in Great Britain had a profound effect as Gordon was mourned as a martyr and Chamberlain's government stumbled over its perceived failure to defend him; in Canada, the debate over whether to participate formally in the expedition reopened wounds on the question of nationalism, and to Australia it would suggest, as would events a few years later, that their neighborhood was considerably more dangerous than they thought and Britain's ability to defend them may be limited. This spirit of unity in the face of the yellow peril, as the particularly nasty and xenophobic variety of political racism directed at fears of a rising and aggressive Asia came to known, did not last long. Almost as soon as Peking fell, disagreements about the future of China erupted amongst the various powers, and soon the Alliance splintered into smaller cliques pursuing their own interests. A group of conservative but ethnically Han court mandarins and provincial governors consolidated under Zhang Zidong had formed a collective mutual defense against both the Boxers and foreign intervention during the war in the wealthy and peaceful Southeast and with the fall of Peking and, with it, likely the Qing authority declared a Republic of China with its capital in Hankow; a quartet of Germany, the United States, Italy and Spain recognized them as the legitimate government of China and signed a peace with them that would earn them concessions such as treaty ports and monetary restitution but allow them to cease in the bubbling conflict in the north that was rapidly turning to low-intensity civil war for British and Japanese soldiers. Russia would be next; having focused during the Boxer War on pushing down through Manchuria, it struck a deal with a returning Manchurian Prince, Zaifeng, to recognize him as the new Emperor with his seat in Peking even as the British scrambled to find any viable Ming heir they could stick on the throne instead, in return for territorial adjustments in favor of Russia and its essential vassalization of Manchuria proper as a pseudo-protectorate, while not denying Russia's suzerainty over newly-independent Turkestan and Mongolia. With the writing on the wall, Japan, France and Austria followed suit in order to score themselves concessions in Shandong, and Britain was left holding the bag, humiliated and furious, having to concede to the terms on the ground after close to a century of having been used to dictating them themselves.

This gargantuan and embarrassing setback for Britain in China was just one of many major European debacles of the Great Powers in the early 1900s. Chamberlain nearly gambled away his government on an election called over "tariff reform," in other words a plan to introduce mild protectionism as a step towards a more fully united Empire that bordered on federation, but he lost his majority and until the stroke that ended his Premiership in 1906 was a weakened shadow of the titanic figure he had been who defined the 1890s. In contrast to its relative successes in China and elsewhere in the Orient, Germany's domestic politics remained as incoherent as ever between its fluid parliamentary factions and its flimsy constitutional construct, and Heinrich I was eventually forced to sack his government and appoint the rigid, conservative and competent Maximilian Egon II, Prince von Furstenburg, as his Chancellor to knock heads on both right and let together to build some kind of unified governmental approach to managing the chaotic politics of the Reich. Russia, while enjoying a tremendous coup that landed in its lap with its advances in the East, nonetheless continued to be a severe underperformer industrially and socially and as the health of Alexander III declined in his advancing age, so did the ability of his various "troikas" of favored court officials to manage the restive country's complex economic and cultural fabric.

Perhaps no country in Europe had as debilitating of an early 1900s as Spain, however. It had always been a peripheral participant in the Chinese conflict and evacuated to return its attention to the Philippines long before the three-way internal conflict between the Republic, the new Qing regime in Peking and Cixi's Loyalist in Xi'an began squaring off against one another. Despite Weyler's best efforts, the war had started to turn against Madrid again, and new Spanish leadership decided to take a remarkably unilateral approach in dealing with suspected Japanese arms smugglers that triggered an all-out war with Japan, as Tokyo responded with indignation at the execution of a Japanese merchant crew and sent their navy south to attempt to sink the Spanish Oriental Fleet at the Battle of Manila Bay. While doling out a fair deal of damage, Spanish submarines - in which the country was and remains a leader - were able to force the Japanese to retreat, but Japanese support for the revolutionaries led by Andres Bonifacio nonetheless helped turn the tide in the war in Luzon as Japanese soldiers fought alongside Filipino rebels to near the outskirts of Manila, and in one of the most decisive and widely studied naval defeats in history, the Spanish fleet in pursuit of the enemy was sunk almost in its entirety at Yaeyama. Only an intervention of Britain, France and Germany prevented the Philippines falling wholesale to Japan, an insult Japan would not soon forget, but in Spain the damage was done - the country cycled through several National Liberal governments in quick succession and the Conservative cabinet elected to replace them headed by Antonio Maura was not much better and handling the shocking loss of prestige seen as presaging the end of the Spanish Empire and its pursuant economic depression.

To an outside observer, the Americas seemed wholly occupied with their own internal matters for the first half of the first decade of the last century of the second millennium. Brazil's Emperor was assassinated in the first days of 1900 five years after defeating a putsch by his cousin, and was replaced by his brother the pious but deferential Luis I, who was reluctant to challenge the increasing influence of right-wing ideologues in the Army and relied on his familial supporters in the Navy to counterbalance them. While both republican regimes, Argentina and Chile continued to dramatically diverge in their paths as the former continued to sprint towards its progressive, radically secular and labor-friendly future under the civic religion of Leandro Alem's worldview, while the latter's decaying oligarchy of urbane liberals and landed gentry conservatives collaborated to crush political opposition and relied on increasingly violent methods to keep the radicalized working class at bay, and that was merely at home - Chile continued its policy of aggressive saber-rattling against not only Argentina but the United States, intervening in the efforts of Ecuador to sell its Galapagos Islands as a naval base to Washinton, while tacitly accepting the French intervention in Colombia's 1899-01 civil war and the subsequent puppetization of Bogota, thus bringing it into the French alignment and supporting France's Panama Canal.

Canals indeed became something of a theme in the Western Hemisphere, as the United States finally passed its Nicaragua Canal Treaty to allow its project competing with the flailing French dig in Panama to go ahead, supported by Washington's thuggish Liberal client in Managua, Jose Santos Zelaya. [1] The Canal Treaty was perhaps one of the few genuine achievements accomplished by the otherwise mediocre and forgettable American President Joseph Foraker, who had ascended to the office by way of his predecessor Hay's assassination and subsequently lost both Houses of Congress as he was reelected by the skin of his teeth in 1900 and then saw one of the worst landslides in American history further wipe out Liberal delegations in the midterms of 1902, and this was even before the Panic of 1904 was triggered by a speculative boom in railroad securities and other stocks exacerbated by a Supreme Court decision interpreting antitrust law narrowly. The economic calamities of the early 1900s saw the job of ending Liberal control in Washington finished off by Hearst, who was elected in a landslide along with supermajorities in Congress in 1904 and immediately went to work on a robust progressive program that included the enshrining of labor rights, regulation of banks and securities brokerages, and amongst a whole host of other initiatives a constitutional amendment for the direct election of Senators, implemented in time for 1908, which he won by an even greater margin. The Progressive Era had officially arrived in the United States, and the relationship between citizens and their government would forever be altered.

The Canal and concerns in Central America would occupy a fair deal of Hearst's attention when he was not ushering through, with the help of his Congressional allies and friendly Governors, his grand Fair Deal program; American influence in Nicaragua as well as Costa Rica was not received well by Mexican and Confederate officialdom who viewed the area as their sphere of influence, particularly Richmond which supported the authoritarian dictatorship of Manuel Estrada Cabrera in the Union of Centroamerica, quietly encouraged Standard Fruit of New Orleans to do everything it could to limit American economic suzerainty in the region, causing a number of incidents including the hijacking of a boat on the high seas and a tense standoff on the coast of Santo Domingo. Hearst's first term would thus be defined abroad by an increasingly aggressive Confederacy and deteriorating relations, in large part the cause of the pugilistic Senator Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina, who having seen his ambitions for the Confederate Presidency thwarted instead pursued power from the Senate and made it his mission to cement all of the Caribbean as Richmond's backyard. With the liberal but extremely unpopular Jose Limantour government in Mexico faltering by the middle of the decade and the rise of the powerful landed interests in the North, particularly the firmly pro-Confederate Creel-Terrazas Clique, the contours of an alliance against America began to take shape, and the interplay between these allies and the United States would within the decade plunge the Hemisphere into its grand conflagration...

[1] As I've mentioned before, Zelaya iOTL was very distinctly not a friend to the US, who spent a lot of money and political capital trying to get rid of him.
 
Tbh I personally don't really like Bonifcaio, wait till this bozo names the country Tagalog Republic with their bs rhetoric and then immediately collapse.
 
Prologue - New Century, New Problems

The 20th century dawned with a sense of trepidation for many, fearful of the massive cultural, technological and economic changes rolling across the world; the phenomenon of this fairly widespread sentiment of queasy dread mixed with cautious optimism that denoted the transition from one century to another came to be known later as the fin de siecle, and there was perhaps reason for people to be worried about what was to come with the dawn of a new century.

No sooner had the 1900s begun than they were marked with extraordinary bloodshed; in China, the Boxer Rebellion against Western influences, in particular the conversion of Chinese to Christianity, had gained such steam that entire provinces across the North of China were utterly lawless, and rather than attempt to put down the revolt, the Qing government controlled by the Dowager Empress Cixi instead not only indulged the Boxers but began encouraging their violent outbursts against Westerners, finally endorsing their cause in the late spring. This ended with the Siege of the Peking Legations, in which thousands of Boxers attacked defenseless foreigners in the quarter of Peking where they resided and, after the makeshift defenses failed, massacred them nearly to a man. When a British expedition to free them failed and was brutally slaughtered in the field, seven European countries - Britain, France, Russia, Germany, Austria, Italy and Spain - along with Japan and the United States formed the Nine Nation Alliance to forcibly retaliate. This Boxer Intervention was a difficult proposition; seizing the port city of Tientsin was exceedingly difficult and the first instances of trench warfare were observed in the Zhihli Province of China over the next year as the Alliance attempted to press towards Peking but were frequently pushed back both by Boxers as well as the professional forces of the Chinese state. In a particularly infamous episode, British General Lord Charles Gordon was surrounded with his men in Tientsin and they were all killed; not until the next spring would the Alliance finally press their way in a bloody campaign in which entire Chinese villages were put to the sword to Peking, which fell in June of 1901 with tens of thousands of casualties, many civilian - including the Guangxu Emperor, under suspicious circumstances, and became an infamous episode of imperialist wanton murder, rape and looting known now as the Sack of Peking.

The Boxer War was a rallying moment across Europe, providing an hour of unprecedented cooperation overseas amongst the imperial powers, and particularly in Great Britain had a profound effect as Gordon was mourned as a martyr and Chamberlain's government stumbled over its perceived failure to defend him; in Canada, the debate over whether to participate formally in the expedition reopened wounds on the question of nationalism, and to Australia it would suggest, as would events a few years later, that their neighborhood was considerably more dangerous than they thought and Britain's ability to defend them may be limited. This spirit of unity in the face of the yellow peril, as the particularly nasty and xenophobic variety of political racism directed at fears of a rising and aggressive Asia came to known, did not last long. Almost as soon as Peking fell, disagreements about the future of China erupted amongst the various powers, and soon the Alliance splintered into smaller cliques pursuing their own interests. A group of conservative but ethnically Han court mandarins and provincial governors consolidated under Zhang Zidong had formed a collective mutual defense against both the Boxers and foreign intervention during the war in the wealthy and peaceful Southeast and with the fall of Peking and, with it, likely the Qing authority declared a Republic of China with its capital in Hankow; a quartet of Germany, the United States, Italy and Spain recognized them as the legitimate government of China and signed a peace with them that would earn them concessions such as treaty ports and monetary restitution but allow them to cease in the bubbling conflict in the north that was rapidly turning to low-intensity civil war for British and Japanese soldiers. Russia would be next; having focused during the Boxer War on pushing down through Manchuria, it struck a deal with a returning Manchurian Prince, Zaifeng, to recognize him as the new Emperor with his seat in Peking even as the British scrambled to find any viable Ming heir they could stick on the throne instead, in return for territorial adjustments in favor of Russia and its essential vassalization of Manchuria proper as a pseudo-protectorate, while not denying Russia's suzerainty over newly-independent Turkestan and Mongolia. With the writing on the wall, Japan, France and Austria followed suit in order to score themselves concessions in Shandong, and Britain was left holding the bag, humiliated and furious, having to concede to the terms on the ground after close to a century of having been used to dictating them themselves.

This gargantuan and embarrassing setback for Britain in China was just one of many major European debacles of the Great Powers in the early 1900s. Chamberlain nearly gambled away his government on an election called over "tariff reform," in other words a plan to introduce mild protectionism as a step towards a more fully united Empire that bordered on federation, but he lost his majority and until the stroke that ended his Premiership in 1906 was a weakened shadow of the titanic figure he had been who defined the 1890s. In contrast to its relative successes in China and elsewhere in the Orient, Germany's domestic politics remained as incoherent as ever between its fluid parliamentary factions and its flimsy constitutional construct, and Heinrich I was eventually forced to sack his government and appoint the rigid, conservative and competent Maximilian Egon II, Prince von Furstenburg, as his Chancellor to knock heads on both right and let together to build some kind of unified governmental approach to managing the chaotic politics of the Reich. Russia, while enjoying a tremendous coup that landed in its lap with its advances in the East, nonetheless continued to be a severe underperformer industrially and socially and as the health of Alexander III declined in his advancing age, so did the ability of his various "troikas" of favored court officials to manage the restive country's complex economic and cultural fabric.

Perhaps no country in Europe had as debilitating of an early 1900s as Spain, however. It had always been a peripheral participant in the Chinese conflict and evacuated to return its attention to the Philippines long before the three-way internal conflict between the Republic, the new Qing regime in Peking and Cixi's Loyalist in Xi'an began squaring off against one another. Despite Weyler's best efforts, the war had started to turn against Madrid again, and new Spanish leadership decided to take a remarkably unilateral approach in dealing with suspected Japanese arms smugglers that triggered an all-out war with Japan, as Tokyo responded with indignation at the execution of a Japanese merchant crew and sent their navy south to attempt to sink the Spanish Oriental Fleet at the Battle of Manila Bay. While doling out a fair deal of damage, Spanish submarines - in which the country was and remains a leader - were able to force the Japanese to retreat, but Japanese support for the revolutionaries led by Andres Bonifacio nonetheless helped turn the tide in the war in Luzon as Japanese soldiers fought alongside Filipino rebels to near the outskirts of Manila, and in one of the most decisive and widely studied naval defeats in history, the Spanish fleet in pursuit of the enemy was sunk almost in its entirety at Yaeyama. Only an intervention of Britain, France and Germany prevented the Philippines falling wholesale to Japan, an insult Japan would not soon forget, but in Spain the damage was done - the country cycled through several National Liberal governments in quick succession and the Conservative cabinet elected to replace them headed by Antonio Maura was not much better and handling the shocking loss of prestige seen as presaging the end of the Spanish Empire and its pursuant economic depression.

To an outside observer, the Americas seemed wholly occupied with their own internal matters for the first half of the first decade of the last century of the second millennium. Brazil's Emperor was assassinated in the first days of 1900 five years after defeating a putsch by his cousin, and was replaced by his brother the pious but deferential Luis I, who was reluctant to challenge the increasing influence of right-wing ideologues in the Army and relied on his familial supporters in the Navy to counterbalance them. While both republican regimes, Argentina and Chile continued to dramatically diverge in their paths as the former continued to sprint towards its progressive, radically secular and labor-friendly future under the civic religion of Leandro Alem's worldview, while the latter's decaying oligarchy of urbane liberals and landed gentry conservatives collaborated to crush political opposition and relied on increasingly violent methods to keep the radicalized working class at bay, and that was merely at home - Chile continued its policy of aggressive saber-rattling against not only Argentina but the United States, intervening in the efforts of Ecuador to sell its Galapagos Islands as a naval base to Washinton, while tacitly accepting the French intervention in Colombia's 1899-01 civil war and the subsequent puppetization of Bogota, thus bringing it into the French alignment and supporting France's Panama Canal.

Canals indeed became something of a theme in the Western Hemisphere, as the United States finally passed its Nicaragua Canal Treaty to allow its project competing with the flailing French dig in Panama to go ahead, supported by Washington's thuggish Liberal client in Managua, Jose Santos Zelaya. [1] The Canal Treaty was perhaps one of the few genuine achievements accomplished by the otherwise mediocre and forgettable American President Joseph Foraker, who had ascended to the office by way of his predecessor Hay's assassination and subsequently lost both Houses of Congress as he was reelected by the skin of his teeth in 1900 and then saw one of the worst landslides in American history further wipe out Liberal delegations in the midterms of 1902, and this was even before the Panic of 1904 was triggered by a speculative boom in railroad securities and other stocks exacerbated by a Supreme Court decision interpreting antitrust law narrowly. The economic calamities of the early 1900s saw the job of ending Liberal control in Washington finished off by Hearst, who was elected in a landslide along with supermajorities in Congress in 1904 and immediately went to work on a robust progressive program that included the enshrining of labor rights, regulation of banks and securities brokerages, and amongst a whole host of other initiatives a constitutional amendment for the direct election of Senators, implemented in time for 1908, which he won by an even greater margin. The Progressive Era had officially arrived in the United States, and the relationship between citizens and their government would forever be altered.

The Canal and concerns in Central America would occupy a fair deal of Hearst's attention when he was not ushering through, with the help of his Congressional allies and friendly Governors, his grand Fair Deal program; American influence in Nicaragua as well as Costa Rica was not received well by Mexican and Confederate officialdom who viewed the area as their sphere of influence, particularly Richmond which supported the authoritarian dictatorship of Manuel Estrada Cabrera in the Union of Centroamerica, quietly encouraged Standard Fruit of New Orleans to do everything it could to limit American economic suzerainty in the region, causing a number of incidents including the hijacking of a boat on the high seas and a tense standoff on the coast of Santo Domingo. Hearst's first term would thus be defined abroad by an increasingly aggressive Confederacy and deteriorating relations, in large part the cause of the pugilistic Senator Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina, who having seen his ambitions for the Confederate Presidency thwarted instead pursued power from the Senate and made it his mission to cement all of the Caribbean as Richmond's backyard. With the liberal but extremely unpopular Jose Limantour government in Mexico faltering by the middle of the decade and the rise of the powerful landed interests in the North, particularly the firmly pro-Confederate Creel-Terrazas Clique, the contours of an alliance against America began to take shape, and the interplay between these allies and the United States would within the decade plunge the Hemisphere into its grand conflagration...

[1] As I've mentioned before, Zelaya iOTL was very distinctly not a friend to the US, who spent a lot of money and political capital trying to get rid of him.
Why wasn't Duke of Yansheng (Desendant of Confucius in main line )or Marquess of Zhu put on throne instead of Zaifeng? Or conversely, why did the South choose a Republic instead of the aforementioned candidates?
 
Last edited:
Why wasn't Duke of Yansheng (Desendant of Confucius in main line )or Marquess of Zhu put on throne instead of Zaifeng? Or conversely, why did the South choose a Republic instead of the aforementioned candidates?
The viceroys all don't really trust each other either but have similar interests in that rule from Beijing takes away their power and slows modernization that would help them economically with the West. A "republic" (again, this is not a Guomindang republic or a liberal republic, this is a monarchless oligarchy with occasional unrepresentative local elections) is friendlier to European and American merchants and also decentralizes power, which is the whole cause celebre of the southern viceroys. Preserve their own power while cutting off northern influence. On the count of the other candidates for emperor, the British and French might have *wanted* them over the Qing candidates, but the other candidates were not particularly influential and the Russians (the only people in a position to be making decisions in the North other than maybe the Japanese) had already cut a deal with the Manchus to preserve their influence with Zaifeng.
 
I'm too lazy to control f the entire latter third of Cinco de Mayo, but is there any mention of Panama and Colombia post-1905 or so? I remember the French project flailing like in OTL but nothing after that. Colombia (and the entirety of that northern Andes region of former Gran Colombia nations) stays out of the GAW, doesn't it?
 
Tbh I personally don't really like Bonifcaio, wait till this bozo names the country Tagalog Republic with their bs rhetoric and then immediately collapse.
Thankfully he didn’t do anything quite that dumb ITTL, though there not being a Mindanao to populate with Tagalogs after Spain and the US take turns genociding the Moros means Visayas counterweights the most ardent Tagalog enthusiasts.
Why wasn't Duke of Yansheng (Desendant of Confucius in main line )or Marquess of Zhu put on throne instead of Zaifeng? Or conversely, why did the South choose a Republic instead of the aforementioned candidates?
The viceroys all don't really trust each other either but have similar interests in that rule from Beijing takes away their power and slows modernization that would help them economically with the West. A "republic" (again, this is not a Guomindang republic or a liberal republic, this is a monarchless oligarchy with occasional unrepresentative local elections) is friendlier to European and American merchants and also decentralizes power, which is the whole cause celebre of the southern viceroys. Preserve their own power while cutting off northern influence. On the count of the other candidates for emperor, the British and French might have *wanted* them over the Qing candidates, but the other candidates were not particularly influential and the Russians (the only people in a position to be making decisions in the North other than maybe the Japanese) had already cut a deal with the Manchus to preserve their influence with Zaifeng.
What @nevaRRaven164 said. Yansheng was almost certainly a candidate for British interests but Zhang and the gang down South had their own interests to protect and didn’t want to wait to see who the outside world imposed on them.

And of course, Zaifeng was the Russian candidate/puppet, and very easily to install in Mukden and then Peking and create a very easy superstructure for those semi-loyal Qing officials unwilling to follow Cixi into the abyss to decamp to
I'm too lazy to control f the entire latter third of Cinco de Mayo, but is there any mention of Panama and Colombia post-1905 or so? I remember the French project flailing like in OTL but nothing after that. Colombia (and the entirety of that northern Andes region of former Gran Colombia nations) stays out of the GAW, doesn't it?
it does stay out, and I don’t think it gets mentioned much if at all (sadly)
 
The Canal and concerns in Central America would occupy a fair deal of Hearst's attention when he was not ushering through, with the help of his Congressional allies and friendly Governors, his grand Fair Deal program; American influence in Nicaragua as well as Costa Rica was not received well by Mexican and Confederate officialdom who viewed the area as their sphere of influence, particularly Richmond which supported the authoritarian dictatorship of Manuel Estrada Cabrera in the Union of Centroamerica, quietly encouraged Standard Fruit of New Orleans to do everything it could to limit American economic suzerainty in the region, causing a number of incidents including the hijacking of a boat on the high seas and a tense standoff on the coast of Santo Domingo. Hearst's first term would thus be defined abroad by an increasingly aggressive Confederacy and deteriorating relations, in large part the cause of the pugilistic Senator Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina, who having seen his ambitions for the Confederate Presidency thwarted instead pursued power from the Senate and made it his mission to cement all of the Caribbean as Richmond's backyard. With the liberal but extremely unpopular Jose Limantour government in Mexico faltering by the middle of the decade and the rise of the powerful landed interests in the North, particularly the firmly pro-Confederate Creel-Terrazas Clique, the contours of an alliance against America began to take shape, and the interplay between these allies and the United States would within the decade plunge the Hemisphere into its grand conflagration...
I completely and utterly forgotten about Jose Limantour. He truly was a seat warmer in the grand scheme of things.
 
You know, I can't remember if this has been dealt with previously in the timeline - but what is the state of Child Labor in the ATL Union and might we see an earlier banning of it than in OTL. Usually, I'd argue that the Democrats would have spearheaded this as early as the Heart administration (and with a more pliant Court you might not run into the early problems with the SC as you saw in OTL) however, the demographics of the ATL Democratic party make this ... difficult. On one hand you have a strong Labor element to the Party and the labor movement had been pushing for this sine the 1870s in OTL (on both humanitarian grounds, as well as the simple fact that hiring children means less jobs for adults and more competition which drive down wages). But, on the other hand, the Dems are the party of immigrant communities, and many immigrant families relied on child labor in order to keep their heads above water, economically, and in OTL resisted calls for its end as a result. Ironically, as much as Curtain Jerker is going to HATE to hear this, the Liberals might be the party more ammiable to limiting our outright banning child labor, what with being the home of middle-class reformers who are going to be agast at the state of children in factories ... or not (first, I doubt that they are going to want to do so in the middle of a war, when many adult men are off in the army fighting for Mom and Apple Pie, leaving industry in desperate need for workers. And two, well, the Liberals are still the party of the industrial barons and many of them aren't going to want to restrict their cheap labor source).

On a related note, what's Lewis W. Hine up to in this TL? I'm sure he's off doing some great photography work on the front lines if nothing else!
 
I completely and utterly forgotten about Jose Limantour. He truly was a seat warmer in the grand scheme of things.
That’s okay I forgot him too lol
You know, I can't remember if this has been dealt with previously in the timeline - but what is the state of Child Labor in the ATL Union and might we see an earlier banning of it than in OTL. Usually, I'd argue that the Democrats would have spearheaded this as early as the Heart administration (and with a more pliant Court you might not run into the early problems with the SC as you saw in OTL) however, the demographics of the ATL Democratic party make this ... difficult. On one hand you have a strong Labor element to the Party and the labor movement had been pushing for this sine the 1870s in OTL (on both humanitarian grounds, as well as the simple fact that hiring children means less jobs for adults and more competition which drive down wages). But, on the other hand, the Dems are the party of immigrant communities, and many immigrant families relied on child labor in order to keep their heads above water, economically, and in OTL resisted calls for its end as a result. Ironically, as much as Curtain Jerker is going to HATE to hear this, the Liberals might be the party more ammiable to limiting our outright banning child labor, what with being the home of middle-class reformers who are going to be agast at the state of children in factories ... or not (first, I doubt that they are going to want to do so in the middle of a war, when many adult men are off in the army fighting for Mom and Apple Pie, leaving industry in desperate need for workers. And two, well, the Liberals are still the party of the industrial barons and many of them aren't going to want to restrict their cheap labor source).

On a related note, what's Lewis W. Hine up to in this TL? I'm sure he's off doing some great photography work on the front lines if nothing else!
Good question.

My thinking here is that there’s probably been some mild federal action though short of an outright ban, but the push for that is coming. State by state though it’s probably a bit ahead of OTL - Tom Marshall in Indiana getting his new constitution, for instance, bans it right off the bat. So you’d probably have something starting to percolate as the war draws close to an end to really do something about the matter, and to your point would have some very unusual cross-party alliances (though nothing as unusual as the unholy Washington Fusionist tickets)
 
That’s okay I forgot him too lol

Good question.

My thinking here is that there’s probably been some mild federal action though short of an outright ban, but the push for that is coming. State by state though it’s probably a bit ahead of OTL - Tom Marshall in Indiana getting his new constitution, for instance, bans it right off the bat. So you’d probably have something starting to percolate as the war draws close to an end to really do something about the matter, and to your point would have some very unusual cross-party alliances (though nothing as unusual as the unholy Washington Fusionist tickets)

Ah, the Progressive Era was THE era for "unusual cross-party alliances" thanks to the party structures being so much in flux - so that makes complete sense (though my favorite story of weird cross-party alliances was the deep friendship between Bob LaFollette Jr. and Robert Taft of all people. The only thing they could generally agree on was that Isolationism was Good and Communism was bad, but it was enough to build a genuine friendship over. Probably helped by the fact that, unlike his dad, Bob Jr. was voted the Most Liked member of the Senate by members due to his non-cantancerous personality and genuinely warm feelings for other members. And then, of course, there was Russell Long and Gaylord Nelson in the Senate a decade later - though, at least, they were of the same party!)

Child labor is such an interesting topic, so I had to broach it :D
 
Ah, the Progressive Era was THE era for "unusual cross-party alliances" thanks to the party structures being so much in flux - so that makes complete sense (though my favorite story of weird cross-party alliances was the deep friendship between Bob LaFollette Jr. and Robert Taft of all people. The only thing they could generally agree on was that Isolationism was Good and Communism was bad, but it was enough to build a genuine friendship over. Probably helped by the fact that, unlike his dad, Bob Jr. was voted the Most Liked member of the Senate by members due to his non-cantancerous personality and genuinely warm feelings for other members. And then, of course, there was Russell Long and Gaylord Nelson in the Senate a decade later - though, at least, they were of the same party!)

Child labor is such an interesting topic, so I had to broach it :D
The disastrous demobilization that’s in the pipeline and commensurate high unemployment would probably make reserving jobs for returning veterans instead of 10 year olds a high priority, I’d think, so it should be coming soon
 
The disastrous demobilization that’s in the pipeline and commensurate high unemployment would probably make reserving jobs for returning veterans instead of 10 year olds a high priority, I’d think, so it should be coming soon

Yeah, I was suspecting that the demobilization may be the kick that the movement really needs to start making some real headway on the issue.

Also, look up Lewis Hine and Riis - both important Progressive Era photographers. They may be interestign figures in your narritive (if nothing else, one or both is probably recording conditions along the fronts right now - and they could be important to the abolitionist movement by recording the conditions of slaves in regions recently liberated by the Union).
 
Top