So what does Anglo-American relations look like in Wrapped in Flames? I doubt it will be like Turtledove since Britain is a trading partner of both America (grain/wheat, corn and industry) and the Confederacy/Dixie (cotton and shipbuilding) plus given what we saw in the Revolutionary War between 1775-1783 and the War of 1812 between 1812-1815 tensions will go down a bit and the relationship will be neutral towards one another. As for American-Confederate relations, the two nations will be very hostile to one another from the beginning since they fought a huge conflict with each other but they might not always fight and if they do it's going to be more indirect such as proxy wars.
Currently relations look like war. But in the post-war world I do want to directly avoid the Turtledove cliche of Britain and America at odds and always at one another's throats. They did, after all, enjoy an enormously profitable trading relationship. US trade with Britain (and British possessions) was close to 60% of it's total trade network in the 1860s OTL, and the loss of that is pretty staggering. The post-war environment will see them running to get those networks back up, but at a bit of cost to themselves. For instance, British railroad securities in London have, for obvious reasons, tanked on the market, and British investors will probably be a bit queasy going into the next decade on picking up Union rail bonds again, which will probably retard rail building plans in the US for a bit. There's going to be bad blood between Washington and London, make no mistake, and you can guarantee it will last at least to the turn of the century.
I won't speculate on any American-Confederate relations though...
What does World War I look like in this universe, assuming everything is unaltered by the timeline.
A Great War analogue isn't set in stone for this universe, but some toss up between the Great Powers is, probably by the 1870s TTL, going to be sort of inevitable in the future because certain things just won't be butterflied
that much. Like I said in the opening, the 1860s hammered out lots of nations and ideologies on the anvil of war, and so far we're seeing that in Canada and the United States, but there's events in Mexico I've touched on, and events in China, South America, Europe and Asia and Africa yet to come!
this time it's the same name which would make it eaiser somehow .sir grant for the British one and then general grant for the american.ect"sir Grant took the descion to refuse the right flank general grant saw this coming and ordered a switch to the left"
but it's mostly for the memes i want that to happen.
True, it would probably be easier. Though I'm afraid Grant is currently too deep on the Mississippi to likely make it to Canada in 1863! I don't think he has high odds of making it there anyways.
There's a few reasons I decided to not have him or Sherman show up north of the border, one of the reasons being that when war broke out in 1862 the man who seems preordained to be assigned there is Henry Halleck, and Halleck had, at a time, a mistrust and misliking of Grant. Historically after Forts Henry and Donelson he effectively tried to demote Grant and place his old mentor Charles Smith over him, and with Halleck designated to command the Department of the Lakes, I figured similar would happen TTL where Smith is charged with leading the invasion of Canada West and Sumner is charged with Canada East, Halleck overseeing it all from headquarters in Albany. Also, it might seem too cliche to have Grant just change direction when I wanted to bring other characters to the forefront of this alternate war!
two wars in living memories might change that. i am imagining it will be a bit like mexico and the US .messing in each other affairs and maybe even a few armed confilcts but by WW2 begones will be begones.
this timeline is more realistic so i don't think there will be generations of fighting each other .
maybe the British eventully grow to regret tje CSA and help america finish it off in WW1.
the fact that this war is called the third anglo American in the future and that canada is impiled to be thriving in the future is probably a clue towards good relations coming around eventully .
Yes three conflicts in less than 100 years is bound to...sour relations between the two countries. Certainly no one in Washington is likely to trust Perfidious Albion until the turn of the century, and even then...
Let's just say that relations will be bad for a while!